Mon Jan 5 18:11:35 EST 2009

Estimating Uncertainty

I have just endured a BRUTAL several months of revision to a paper on a LBL-type whale tracking system. A portion of the revision involved how one estimates the uncertainty in the resulting whale track. It hurts my head just to think about, but I wanted to make some notes for future reference.

  • My first recommendation is to first read the Guide to Uncertainty In Measurement and understand the difference between Type A errors (those you can measure with statistics) and Type B errors (those you can only estimate) and their recommendations regarding how to estimate them. If you do this before you even begin a measurement project it will help you think about what you need to measure later on. (The GUM is a NIST/ISO document that isn’t free so you won’t usually find it floating around the web willy-nilly.)
  • When ever possible, try to make a series of ground-truth measurements (i.e. try to position something for which you know the position already). Using real measurements to characterize your uncertainty is far far easier than trying to estimate it by other means.
  • When you have to measure the uncertainty in various parts of a measurement and then propagate those uncertainties through a subsequent calculation (using the law of propagation of variance), it is worth while to list every measurement and how you will assess it’s uncertainty. For example, in our whale tracking, how do you know the GPS uncertainty, the detection algorithm uncertainty, the sound speed and ray-tracking uncertainty, the uncertainty associated with false detections or multipath, etc. Understanding this up front may help you design measurements to address them before you get to writing your paper.
  • When attempting to assess the uncertainty in some measurement, don’t be tempted to look at an O-scope, and roughly characterize the uncertainty by the maximum variation you see. It might be more conservative, but it is too hard to describe later. Make actual measurements (preferably with a data acquisition system) save the results, calculate a real statistic (RMS, std deviation, etc.)
  • Finally, if it were all possible, it would be worth while to get buy-in from all involved on the strategies for assessing each of these uncertainties early on in the process.

There’s more to say and more to think about, but this is enough for now.


Posted by vschmidt | Permanent link | File under: ocean_engineering